9 tactics agencies still sell.
AI rewards none of them.

Tactics that agencies still sell. Tactics that still get founders penalized. The system was built to replace all of them.

Most agencies stopped selling these — but not all.

🪦
Automated Link Building
2008 – 2024
Mass outreach, link farms, paid placements. Google penalizes it. AI ignores it entirely — AI doesn’t count backlinks.
We build instead:

Content AI recommends because it’s the best answer — not because someone paid for a link.

🪦
Private Blog Networks
2010 – 2022
Fake websites linking to yours. One algorithm update wipes the entire network — and your rankings with it.
We build instead:

Real authority on your domain that AI platforms trust on its own merits.

🪦
Content Spinning
2009 – 2023
Rewriting the same article 50 times with synonym swaps. AI detects duplicate intent instantly. Spun content doesn’t get recommended — it gets filtered.
We build instead:

Original, data-rich content that earns recommendations because it can’t be summarized without naming you.

🪦
Keyword Stuffing
2005 – 2019
Cramming keywords into every paragraph. AI reads intent, not density. Content that sounds like it was written for an algorithm gets ignored by AI — and by humans.
We build instead:

Answer-first content structured for how AI actually extracts and recommends.

Those tactics are dead. But it gets worse.

The next five are being sold right now — by companies that know better.

Meanwhile, AI is choosing who gets the leads in your market. The company that dominated Google for a decade starts from the same line as you.

Find Out if AI Recommends You →

Free. 60 seconds. No credit card.

These aren’t relics — they’re being sold right now.

By companies that know better.

🪦
Content Flooding
2023 – Present
100 articles in 12 weeks. No quality checks. On a newer, lower-authority site, this tanks authority instead of building it. The agency hits their deliverable count. Your rankings pay the price.
We build instead:

Authority-matched velocity. The system knows how much your domain can absorb — and never publishes faster than your authority can support.

🪦
Publish-and-Hope
2023 – Present
AI generates content, publishes it, everyone crosses their fingers. No confidence scoring. No experiments. If the model wrote it, it ships.
We build instead:

Nothing deploys below 80% confidence. Every change earns its way through controlled experiments.

🪦
The $5K/Month Retainer
2010 – Present
You’re not paying for outcomes. You’re renting a strategist’s calendar. $3K–$15K/month for the privilege of waiting for someone to open your ticket.
We build instead:

A system that runs autonomously for $199–$499/mo. No strategist hours. No retainer. The system runs whether anyone’s at their desk or not.

🪦
Demo-Gated Pricing
2015 – Present
“Book a demo.” “Let’s talk.” “Schedule a call.” Translation: we won’t tell you what it costs until we’ve qualified you. If the price were competitive, they’d publish it.
We build instead:

$199, $299, or $499/mo. On the website. No demos. No calls. Your domain earns its tier — not a salesperson.

🪦
Optimizing for a Dying Channel
2024 – Present
“1,400% traffic increase!” “452% organic growth!” All measured in Google rankings — on a platform losing 38% of traffic per year. They’re great at a game that’s being replaced.
We build instead:

Visibility where buyers actually are — in the AI answer, where the majority of searches never reach Google at all.

These aren’t nine different problems. They’re nine symptoms of the same one.

Every tactic on this page assumes you should optimize for a search engine that’s losing traffic every year. Only 12% of pages that rank on Google get recommended by AI. The game changed. The playbook didn’t.

Sample data
AI visibility audit showing 6 dimensions scored 0-100

This is what it looks like when someone actually measures the new game.

If you’ve been researching this space

SEO

Optimizes your website to rank higher on Google. But ranking on Google doesn’t mean AI will recommend you — only 12% of top Google results get cited by ChatGPT.

AEO

Formats your content so AI can read it. But being readable isn’t enough — AI still needs to trust you, know your claims, and choose you over alternatives.

GEO

Tracks whether AI mentions you and tries to increase those mentions. But tracking and measuring doesn’t create the effect — it just shows you the score.

Citation Engineering builds what all three need to work — the identity, proof points, and content that AI needs before it can recommend you at all.

The game that replaced all of them.

Other tools track how you’re doing on Google. We make AI recommend you instead.

$199–$499/mo. Marketing agencies charge $3,000–$15,000 and can’t do this.

No contracts. Keep everything we build.

When someone asks an AI who the best companies in your market are — is your company in the answer?

Find Out if AI Recommends You →

60 seconds. Your data, not a template.

Be the answer.